Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZR3
85 Imaging
52 Features
76 Overall
61
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb0e4/eb0e4df188708e722444145de22d49337059dcdf" alt="Olympus PEN E-P5 front Olympus PEN E-P5 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34c67/34c6734883b80a006f99e64c346b19b37961391d" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZR3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Revealed October 2013
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 159g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-ZX3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZR3 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZR3, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-P5 (16MP) and the ZR3 (14MP) is very close but the E-P5 (Four Thirds) and ZR3 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-P5 was introduced 3 years later than the ZR3 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-P5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZR3 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-P5 grades against the ZR3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZR3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-P5 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P5 Gallery & Panasonic ZR3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Panasonic ZR3
E-P5 | ZR3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2013 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 45 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR3 over the Olympus E-P5
ZR3 | E-P5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P5 and Panasonic ZR3
E-P5 | ZR3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZR3 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P5 features outer measurements of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZR3 has sizing of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZR3 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-P5 against the ZR3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1096/f1096d5d4f3a50af60425079837aa9a3f85f9517" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZR3 size comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZR3 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-P5 and ZR3 is 85 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/356ad/356ad4e91a6a91e1b9293310a995288b81153549" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZR3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZR3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZR3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing purely by viewing specifications. The visual below might offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P5 and ZR3.
To sum up, both the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-P5 with its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-P5 will render greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-P5 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71718/71718bb3773100aea7a7317d471f2766dff46990" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZR3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZR3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4e30/f4e30c941a9f9e250512ac70b992203f9cb9cf45" alt="Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZR3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-P5 vs Panasonic ZR3 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-P5 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR3 |
Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-ZX3 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2013-10-03 | 2010-01-26 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine HD II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 35 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/1300s |
Continuous shutter speed | 9.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (ISO 100) | 5.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/320s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | AVCHD Lite |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 420 grams (0.93 lbs) | 159 grams (0.35 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 895 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $389 | $280 |