Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
85 Imaging
52 Features
76 Overall
61


77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Launched October 2013
- Previous Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Announced November 2009

Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the E-P5 (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the E-P5 (Four Thirds) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) use different sensor sizes.

The E-P5 was unveiled 3 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-P5 grades against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-P5 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-P5 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
E-P5 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2013 | ![]() | November 2009 | Newer by 48 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper display (+117k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus E-P5
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | E-P5 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-P5 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
E-P5 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P5 provides exterior measurements of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-P5 and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-P5 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 85 and 77 respectively.

Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by going through a spec sheet. The pic below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P5 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can see, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-P5 having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus E-P5 will show more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-P5 provides an edge in sensor technology.

Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus PEN E-P5 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus PEN E-P5 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2013-10-03 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 50mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shooting rate | 9.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (ISO 100) | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/320s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 420g (0.93 lbs) | 453g (1.00 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 895 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 320 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $389 | $566 |