Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh WG-M1
85 Imaging
51 Features
76 Overall
61
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Revealed October 2013
- Old Model is Olympus E-P3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-P5 versus Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the E-P5 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively similar but the E-P5 (Four Thirds) and WG-M1 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-P5 was unveiled 11 months earlier than the WG-M1 and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-P5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-P5 scores vs the WG-M1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-P5 & Ricoh WG-M1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-P5 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| E-P5 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 115k | Clearer screen (+922k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus E-P5
| WG-M1 | E-P5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 | October 2013 | Newer by 11 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-P5 and Ricoh WG-M1
| E-P5 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-P5 has got external measurements of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-P5 versus Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-P5 against the WG-M1.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-P5 and WG-M1 is 85 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions just by going over specs. The image below will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P5 and WG-M1.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-P5 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-P5 will offer greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged E-P5 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-P5 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-P5 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-P5 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2013-10-03 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 9.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.00 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/320 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 420 grams (0.93 lbs) | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 72 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 895 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 images | 350 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at launch | $389 | $2,000 |