Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4040e/4040ea371e512581982d727ade48ba612633d9a7" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1 front Olympus PEN E-PL1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0063/e00637e5677671b8b72fa1976b25d95bb3a79c37" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ front Olympus SP-810 UZ front"
78 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched May 2010
- Successor is Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
- 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
- Launched July 2011
- Superseded the Olympus SP-800 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both produced by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL1 (12MP) and the SP-810 UZ (14MP) is very close but the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and SP-810 UZ (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-PL1 was launched 14 months prior to the SP-810 UZ making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-810 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a brief view of how the E-PL1 grades against the SP-810 UZ when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL1 and Olympus SP-810 UZ. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL1 Gallery and Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Olympus SP-810 UZ
E-PL1 | SP-810 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the Olympus E-PL1
SP-810 UZ | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2011 | ![]() | May 2010 | Fresher by 14 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Olympus SP-810 UZ
E-PL1 | SP-810 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL1 offers physical measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-810 UZ has proportions of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the E-PL1 versus the SP-810 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c44f/7c44f375fbade71ae5fc833a7f92d31cfc76805c" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ size comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL1 and SP-810 UZ is 86 and 78 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36c04/36c04eb43c34a8f9fe1b90d0d953b8794d8ff923" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through specs. The visual below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL1 and SP-810 UZ.
All in all, both of those cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PL1 because of its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus SP-810 UZ will result in more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The older E-PL1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cbce/8cbce54f2b3f89a1050d5d809a46245999ec2d0a" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6a3c/e6a3ccbc848497df7e4e851096b10cb480ba616c" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Olympus SP-810 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Olympus SP-810 UZ |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-05-17 | 2011-07-27 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic V | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-864mm (36.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.9-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 1/4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1200s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 0.7 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 6.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 334 grams (0.74 lb) | 413 grams (0.91 lb) |
Dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 54 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 487 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $288 | $280 |