Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4040e/4040ea371e512581982d727ade48ba612633d9a7" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1 front Olympus PEN E-PL1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90636/906367f78182e973de499b537fdc76fa3fafdc16" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Revealed May 2010
- New Model is Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both are designed by Olympus. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the E-PL1 (12MP) and TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-PL1 was brought out 4 years earlier than the TG-850 iHS which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-PL1 scores versus the TG-850 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL1 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL1 Gallery and Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-PL1 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus E-PL1
TG-850 iHS | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | May 2010 | Newer by 45 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-PL1 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL1 features outer dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-850 iHS has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the E-PL1 compared to the TG-850 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/812d1/812d1051611ee04bcd51e6113cf6524979e19554" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL1 and TG-850 iHS is 86 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95f26/95f26d4e66b21585bc2cdb3a5567cb0d01a6dd16" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions simply by researching specs. The pic below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL1 and TG-850 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL1 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus TG-850 iHS will provide you with extra detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged E-PL1 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f0e8/3f0e84ef8e2ac7cdc3bc920c099955e2c546be5a" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f32f/0f32f616112a337829825c5be856dc87c8f93830" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2010-05-17 | 2014-01-29 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Truepic V | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4616 x 3464 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 334 grams (0.74 pounds) | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 54 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 487 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 pictures | 330 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $288 | $250 |