Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-860
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
91 Imaging
41 Features
42 Overall
41
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched May 2010
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Released February 2015
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-870
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Olympus E-PL1 versus Olympus TG-860, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the E-PL1 (12MP) and TG-860 (16MP) and the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and TG-860 (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-PL1 was unveiled 5 years before the TG-860 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a full comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-PL1 matches up against the TG-860 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL1 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL1 Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Olympus TG-860
E-PL1 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus E-PL1
TG-860 | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | May 2010 | More modern by 57 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Olympus TG-860
E-PL1 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL1 provides exterior dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) and the Olympus TG-860 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL1 versus Olympus TG-860 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-PL1 vs the TG-860.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL1 and TG-860 is 86 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading through specs. The picture underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL1 and TG-860.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PL1 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-860 will give more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged E-PL1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2010-05-17 | 2015-02-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Truepic V | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 334 gr (0.74 pounds) | 224 gr (0.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 54 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 487 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 images | 300 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $288 | $279 |