Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-320
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4040e/4040ea371e512581982d727ade48ba612633d9a7" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1 front Olympus PEN E-PL1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ced/f3cedb69b934f7169f253825ad9ca28abd57cd22" alt="Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Released May 2010
- Newer Model is Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-320, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-PL1 (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly comparable but the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and TG-320 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-PL1 was manufactured 20 months prior to the TG-320 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-PL1 grades versus the TG-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL1 & Olympus TG-320. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL1 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Olympus TG-320
E-PL1 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus E-PL1
TG-320 | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | May 2010 | More modern by 20 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Olympus TG-320
E-PL1 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical display measurement |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera, you have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL1 provides outer measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-320 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-PL1 vs the TG-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/783c6/783c63743dc8c90aabd3aaf68a22a63c8b0b0141" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL1 and TG-320 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b85/40b85c1450646ca2f01a8583910ad8f32b4d3b87" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to envision the difference in sensor sizes purely by seeing technical specs. The image underneath may provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL1 and TG-320.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-PL1 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-320 will provide extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-PL1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32ac1/32ac13c3c8caff9a32231f80ebf5ee7a0b3d6e2e" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd4a0/dd4a0b56d23f0a70e00d8107dfd4d1d0e4f53f07" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Olympus TG-320 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-05-17 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Truepic V | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 5.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 334 grams (0.74 lb) | 155 grams (0.34 lb) |
Dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 54 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 487 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 images | 150 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $288 | $0 |