Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Introduced May 2010
- Newer Model is Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
Photography Glossary Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and they are both offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PL1 (12MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is very comparable but the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-PL1 was announced 4 years before the TG-2 iHS and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-PL1 scores against the TG-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL1 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL1 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| E-PL1 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-PL1
| TG-2 iHS | E-PL1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2013 | May 2010 | Fresher by 37 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 610k | 230k | Sharper display (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| E-PL1 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL1 has got exterior dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has proportions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-PL1 and the TG-2 iHS.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL1 and TG-2 iHS is 86 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by checking out specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL1 and TG-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with the identical megapixels but not the same sensor sizing. The E-PL1 comes with the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow DOF less difficult. The older E-PL1 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-05-17 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Truepic V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 334 gr (0.74 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 54 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 487 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 images | 350 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $288 | $380 |