Clicky

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
43
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-PL1 front
 
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front
Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
42
Overall
38

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-PL1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
  • Introduced May 2010
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-PL1s
Olympus TG-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
  • Revealed June 2013
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview

Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and they are both offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PL1 (12MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is very comparable but the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-PL1 was announced 4 years before the TG-2 iHS and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-PL1 scores against the TG-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS

 E-PL1 TG-2 iHS 
Focus manually Dial accurate focus

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-PL1

 TG-2 iHS E-PL1 
RevealedJune 2013May 2010Fresher by 37 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution610k230kSharper display (+380k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Olympus TG-2 iHS

 E-PL1 TG-2 iHS 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL1 has got exterior dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has proportions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

See the Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-PL1 and the TG-2 iHS.

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL1 and TG-2 iHS is 86 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by checking out specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL1 and TG-2 iHS.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with the identical megapixels but not the same sensor sizing. The E-PL1 comes with the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow DOF less difficult. The older E-PL1 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-2 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
60
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
27
includes face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 Street photography information
Olympus TG-2 iHS Street photography information
74
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
no articulating screen
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 Sports photography features
Olympus TG-2 iHS Sports photography features
44
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
megapixel count low (12MP)
terrible battery life (290 shots)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
40
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking focus
weather sealing
better than average battery life (350 shots)
slow frames per second (5.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 Travel photography highlights
Olympus TG-2 iHS Travel photography highlights
51
built-in flash
no Timelapse mode
terrible battery life (290 per charge)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
68
better than average battery life (350 CIPA)
weather sealing
built-in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
missing Timelapse function
low MP (12MP)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 Landscape photography information
Olympus TG-2 iHS Landscape photography information
55
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
megapixel count low (12MP)
terrible battery life (290 per charge)
no Timelapse mode
46
reasonably wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
better than average battery life (350 per charge)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual exposure
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
missing Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 Vlogging advice
Olympus TG-2 iHS Vlogging advice
29
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detect autofocus
does not have selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone port
36
reasonably wide (25mm)
very good max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
missing microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL1 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
 Olympus PEN E-PL1Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL1 Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Introduced 2010-05-17 2013-06-28
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Truepic V -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4032 x 3024 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 11 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 610k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating OLED
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 10.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/160 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 334 gr (0.74 pounds) 230 gr (0.51 pounds)
Physical dimensions 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 54 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.1 not tested
DXO Low light rating 487 not tested
Other
Battery life 290 images 350 images
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-1 Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card -
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $288 $380