Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
86 Imaging
46 Features
43 Overall
44
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Introduced May 2010
- Newer Model is Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and they are both offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PL1 (12MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is very comparable but the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-PL1 was announced 4 years before the TG-2 iHS and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-PL1 scores against the TG-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL1 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL1 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| E-PL1 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-PL1
| TG-2 iHS | E-PL1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2013 | May 2010 | Fresher by 37 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 610k | 230k | Sharper display (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
| E-PL1 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL1 has got exterior dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has proportions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-PL1 and the TG-2 iHS.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL1 and TG-2 iHS is 86 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by checking out specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL1 and TG-2 iHS.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras come with the identical megapixels but not the same sensor sizing. The E-PL1 comes with the larger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow DOF less difficult. The older E-PL1 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-05-17 | 2013-06-28 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Truepic V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 334 gr (0.74 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 54 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 487 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 images | 350 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $288 | $380 |