Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VG-160
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4040e/4040ea371e512581982d727ade48ba612633d9a7" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1 front Olympus PEN E-PL1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Revealed May 2010
- Later Model is Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Below is a comprehensive overview of the Olympus E-PL1 and Olympus VG-160, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are sold by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PL1 (12MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is very comparable but the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-PL1 was revealed 20 months before the VG-160 making them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-PL1 matches up versus the VG-160 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL1 and Olympus VG-160. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL1 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Olympus VG-160
E-PL1 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-PL1
VG-160 | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | May 2010 | More recent by 20 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Olympus VG-160
E-PL1 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL1 features physical dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) while the Olympus VG-160 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-PL1 and Olympus VG-160 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-PL1 and the VG-160.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7944/e7944bf7b08df22429ee3ff60444cfcb9915a16d" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL1 and VG-160 is 86 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04fd2/04fd28030f3029badd7364ed78c36dea8e7ed340" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements simply by seeing technical specs. The visual here may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL1 and VG-160.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PL1 using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus VG-160 will produce greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older E-PL1 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e74ce/e74ce66028210bd5b2d0e2fc37ba120d0d07f3fa" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8843/c884373f2c70065b8540aa3761da387d1a7e52fc" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Olympus VG-160 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Olympus VG-160 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-05-17 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Truepic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 7cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 334 grams (0.74 lb) | 125 grams (0.28 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 54 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 487 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 pictures | 165 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $288 | $90 |