Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4040e/4040ea371e512581982d727ade48ba612633d9a7" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1 front Olympus PEN E-PL1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched May 2010
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PL1 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-PL1 was released 14 months earlier than the VR-320 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-PL1 matches up against the VR-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL1 & Olympus VR-320. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL1 Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Olympus VR-320
E-PL1 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-PL1
VR-320 | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | July 2011 | ![]() | May 2010 | More recent by 14 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Olympus VR-320
E-PL1 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL1 has got external dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-PL1 vs the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/847b6/847b65ee10016f21bfcfb5b954e66d1d3b620552" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL1 and VR-320 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19136/1913688dcb5843b47ae8c603149ee05b23d6b32b" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements purely by seeing specifications. The graphic below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL1 and VR-320.
Plainly, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL1 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus VR-320 will show greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older E-PL1 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d92c/2d92c9b38f48bc6f820966f4c1934ccd167dacb4" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ad17/3ad170dda8fcf0dcc08d77789444e8babbaf4883" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Olympus VR-320 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-05-17 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic V | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 334 grams (0.74 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 54 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 487 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $288 | $179 |