Clicky

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
43
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-PL1 front
 
Olympus VR-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
35
Overall
36

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL1
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
  • Launched May 2010
  • Renewed by Olympus E-PL1s
Olympus VR-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Revealed July 2011
  • Successor is Olympus VR-330
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview

Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PL1 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and VR-320 (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-PL1 was released 14 months earlier than the VR-320 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera.

Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-PL1 matches up against the VR-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Olympus VR-320

 E-PL1 VR-320 
Manually focus Very exact focusing

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus E-PL1

 VR-320 E-PL1 
RevealedJuly 2011May 2010More recent by 14 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Olympus VR-320

 E-PL1 VR-320 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kSame screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch screen Neither contains Touch screen

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL1 has got external dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

See the Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-PL1 vs the VR-320.

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL1 and VR-320 is 86 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements purely by seeing specifications. The graphic below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL1 and VR-320.

Plainly, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL1 due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus VR-320 will show greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older E-PL1 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Portrait photography camera
60
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection focusing
exports RAW formats
low MP (12 megapixels)
33
decent megapixels (14MP)
offers face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 Street photography features
Olympus VR-320 Street photography features
74
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others in class (158g)
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 Sports photography details
Olympus VR-320 Sports photography details
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
low frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
low MP (12 megapixels)
not so great battery power (290 shots)
lack of phase detect AF
47
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VR-320 as a Travel photography camera
51
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse mode
not so great battery power (290 CIPA)
low MP (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
70
lighter than others in class (158 grams)
decent megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
does not have Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL1 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus VR-320 Landscape photography highlights
55
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
small screen (2.7")
low MP (12 megapixels)
not so great battery power (290 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse mode
42
reasonably wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-PL1
Vlogging with Olympus VR-320
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detection focusing
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic jack
32
reasonably wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detect focus
lighter than others in class (158 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have microphone socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL1 and Olympus VR-320
 Olympus PEN E-PL1Olympus VR-320
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL1 Olympus VR-320
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2010-05-17 2011-07-19
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Truepic V TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 3200 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-300mm (12.5x)
Max aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 3.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 10.00 m 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/160 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 334 grams (0.74 lb) 158 grams (0.35 lb)
Dimensions 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 54 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.1 not tested
DXO Low light rating 487 not tested
Other
Battery life 290 photos -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-1 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at release $288 $179