Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4040e/4040ea371e512581982d727ade48ba612633d9a7" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1 front Olympus PEN E-PL1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Released May 2010
- New Model is Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are produced by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-PL1 (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is pretty comparable but the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") provide totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-PL1 was manufactured 3 years prior to the XZ-2 iHS and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-PL1 scores vs the XZ-2 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL1 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL1 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-PL1 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-PL1
XZ-2 iHS | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2012 | ![]() | May 2010 | Fresher by 31 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-PL1 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL1 provides outer measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") having a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-PL1 compared to the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b029/8b0298298348b80593649d8fee44facd69c37eb2" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL1 and XZ-2 iHS is 86 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6808/a6808e9cd1700855dbafdaa6788b1c2fee40cf8b" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing simply by going through technical specs. The visual underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL1 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have the same MP albeit not the same sensor sizing. The E-PL1 includes the bigger sensor which will make obtaining shallower depth of field less difficult. The older E-PL1 will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3dc22/3dc2227486a11ac2ffc60437464f90a5ebb7611b" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9193/d91937b0ebe02920eb5b3343a10501570104150a" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-05-17 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 334 gr (0.74 pounds) | 346 gr (0.76 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 54 | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 487 | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photographs | 340 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $288 | $450 |