Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic 3D1
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4040e/4040ea371e512581982d727ade48ba612633d9a7" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1 front Olympus PEN E-PL1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aea2e/aea2eaaf83f43ab5c09e1ef48ec446437cef3c4e" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 front"
93 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic 3D1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Announced May 2010
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 193g - 108 x 58 x 24mm
- Introduced November 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic 3D1 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus E-PL1 and Panasonic 3D1, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-PL1 (12MP) and the 3D1 (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and 3D1 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-PL1 was launched 17 months earlier than the 3D1 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic 3D1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-PL1 scores versus the 3D1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic 3D1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL1 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL1 Gallery and Panasonic 3D1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Panasonic 3D1
E-PL1 | 3D1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic 3D1 over the Olympus E-PL1
3D1 | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2011 | ![]() | May 2010 | Newer by 17 months |
Screen dimension | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Panasonic 3D1
E-PL1 | 3D1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic 3D1 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL1 provides exterior measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) whilst the Panasonic 3D1 has dimensions of 108mm x 58mm x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PL1 and Panasonic 3D1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-PL1 vs the 3D1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba16b/ba16ba53abe164ea57584840da6342a43f128e12" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic 3D1 size comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic 3D1 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL1 and 3D1 is 86 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a1b6/4a1b675bc9f2d5de0cd34d963c765275b97ac24e" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic 3D1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic 3D1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic 3D1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through specs. The pic below should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL1 and 3D1.
As you can plainly see, both cameras posses the exact same resolution albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The E-PL1 has got the bigger sensor which will make obtaining shallow DOF less difficult. The more aged E-PL1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7a3d/a7a3d9aaa0f6bc222afec33d1bfc19d8ec7b7fdb" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic 3D1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic 3D1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic 3D1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be739/be7395b1c9188cf532e7e87c3db36890f3bd0588" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic 3D1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic 3D1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic 3D1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-05-17 | 2011-11-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Truepic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.9-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3.5" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Full Touch Screen with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 334 gr (0.74 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 108 x 58 x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 54 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 487 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 images | 200 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $288 | $670 |