Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FS42
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4040e/4040ea371e512581982d727ade48ba612633d9a7" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1 front Olympus PEN E-PL1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched May 2010
- Newer Model is Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Boost to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Revealed April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-PL1 versus Panasonic FS42, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-PL1 (12MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is relatively well matched but the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and FS42 (1/2.5") offer different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-PL1 was manufactured 14 months later than the FS42 which makes them a generation apart from one another. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-PL1 scores vs the FS42 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL1 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL1 Gallery & Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Panasonic FS42
E-PL1 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2010 | ![]() | April 2009 | Fresher by 14 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus E-PL1
FS42 | E-PL1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Panasonic FS42
E-PL1 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL1 has exterior measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) while the Panasonic FS42 has measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PL1 versus Panasonic FS42 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the E-PL1 against the FS42.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0ed09/0ed0905592f8449c076314fecbcd7824e0cf1795" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL1 and FS42 is 86 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2611c/2611c7567404da41a0a5820f69be1afbfef35bd0" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL1 and FS42.
As you can see, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-PL1 due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-PL1 will give greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-PL1 provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bb4cd/bb4cd1a4a31a5a5a1467b6b7dcdd9cd32ed84642" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4aab/e4aabdc6924ccf88a9b40d032fbf5c14862a9c06" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2010-05-17 | 2009-04-17 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Truepic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1000 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 6.30 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 334 gr (0.74 pounds) | 132 gr (0.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 54 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 487 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 images | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $288 | $580 |