Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FZ200
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4040e/4040ea371e512581982d727ade48ba612633d9a7" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1 front Olympus PEN E-PL1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14531/14531b22504a4959f06ffa69a9ec4d9107943879" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front"
65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Released May 2010
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Released July 2012
- Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ100
- Replacement is Panasonic FZ300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FZ200, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-PL1 (12MP) and the FZ200 (12MP) is relatively similar but the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-PL1 was introduced 3 years prior to the FZ200 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the E-PL1 scores vs the FZ200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL1 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL1 Gallery and Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Panasonic FZ200
E-PL1 | FZ200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-PL1
FZ200 | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2012 | ![]() | May 2010 | More recent by 26 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Panasonic FZ200
E-PL1 | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL1 provides outside dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has dimensions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") accompanied by a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FZ200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL1 against the FZ200.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c585b/c585ba20b21846275f717b9582849b9de53cf314" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL1 and FZ200 is 86 and 65 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5de67/5de67352800d62a7cbd551383e5c5dbb19a24f0a" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements only by reading a spec sheet. The visual here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL1 and FZ200.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses the exact same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor measurements. The E-PL1 contains the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow depth of field simpler. The older E-PL1 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2a3c/f2a3c561af697ef4fae5433ca493afdb088c438a" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3bcf5/3bcf518b0254369dc514a70bab4307107a5fd194" alt="Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1 vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-05-17 | 2012-07-18 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Truepic V | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 13.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 334 grams (0.74 lb) | 588 grams (1.30 lb) |
Dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 54 | 37 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | 10.8 |
DXO Low light rating | 487 | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 pictures | 540 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $288 | $499 |