Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K200D
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
61 Imaging
49 Features
41 Overall
45
Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Released May 2010
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Launched September 2008
- Replaced the Pentax K100D S
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K200D Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus E-PL1 and Pentax K200D, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-PL1 (12MP) and the K200D (10MP) is very similar but the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and K200D (APS-C) have totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-PL1 was announced 21 months after the K200D making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the E-PL1 grades vs the K200D with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K200D Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL1 & Pentax K200D. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL1 Gallery & Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Pentax K200D
| E-PL1 | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2010 | September 2008 | Newer by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus E-PL1
| K200D | E-PL1 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Pentax K200D
| E-PL1 | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal display sizing | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL1 enjoys external measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) whilst the Pentax K200D has measurements of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") and a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL1 and Pentax K200D in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the E-PL1 compared to the K200D.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL1 and K200D is 86 and 61 respectively.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading technical specs. The picture underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL1 and K200D.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL1 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus E-PL1 will offer you greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The newer E-PL1 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K200D Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Pentax K200D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Pentax K200D |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2010-05-17 | 2008-09-01 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Truepic V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/160s | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 334g (0.74 pounds) | 690g (1.52 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 54 | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | 22.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light score | 487 | 561 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $288 | $600 |