Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K200D
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
61 Imaging
49 Features
41 Overall
45
Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Released May 2010
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Launched September 2008
- Replaced the Pentax K100D S
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K200D Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus E-PL1 and Pentax K200D, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-PL1 (12MP) and the K200D (10MP) is very similar but the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and K200D (APS-C) have totally different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-PL1 was announced 21 months after the K200D making them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the E-PL1 grades vs the K200D with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K200D Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL1 & Pentax K200D. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL1 Gallery & Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Pentax K200D
| E-PL1 | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | May 2010 | September 2008 | Newer by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus E-PL1
| K200D | E-PL1 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Pentax K200D
| E-PL1 | K200D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equal display sizing | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL1 enjoys external measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) whilst the Pentax K200D has measurements of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") and a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL1 and Pentax K200D in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the E-PL1 compared to the K200D.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL1 and K200D is 86 and 61 respectively.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading technical specs. The picture underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL1 and K200D.
As you have seen, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL1 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus E-PL1 will offer you greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The newer E-PL1 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-PL1 vs Pentax K200D Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Pentax K200D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Pentax K200D |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2010-05-17 | 2008-09-01 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Truepic V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/160s | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 334g (0.74 pounds) | 690g (1.52 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 54 | 64 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | 22.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | 11.4 |
| DXO Low light score | 487 | 561 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $288 | $600 |