Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh PX
86 Imaging
46 Features
43 Overall
44
95 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Released May 2010
- Later Model is Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Released August 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh PX Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh PX, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the E-PL1 (12MP) and PX (16MP) and the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and PX (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-PL1 was announced 15 months prior to the PX which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short view of how the E-PL1 grades against the PX with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh PX Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL1 & Ricoh PX. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PL1 Gallery & Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Ricoh PX
| E-PL1 | PX |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Olympus E-PL1
| PX | E-PL1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2011 | May 2010 | Fresher by 15 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Ricoh PX
| E-PL1 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same screen measurement | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL1 has got physical dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) whilst the Ricoh PX has sizing of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh PX in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-PL1 and the PX.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL1 and PX is 86 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizing just by researching specs. The visual below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL1 and PX.
All in all, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL1 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Ricoh PX will render greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots way more aggressively. The older E-PL1 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-PL1 vs Ricoh PX Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Ricoh PX | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Ricoh PX |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-05-17 | 2011-08-16 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Truepic V | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3072 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.4 |
| Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 334 grams (0.74 lbs) | 156 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 54 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 487 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 pictures | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-1 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $288 | $329 |