Olympus E-PL1 vs Samsung EX2F
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Olympus E-PL1 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Announced May 2010
- Updated by Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Introduced December 2012
Olympus E-PL1 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Olympus E-PL1 and Samsung EX2F, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-PL1 (12MP) and the EX2F (12MP) is pretty close but the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and EX2F (1/1.7") possess different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-PL1 was brought out 3 years before the EX2F and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung EX2F being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-PL1 grades versus the EX2F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL1 & Samsung EX2F. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL1 Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Samsung EX2F
E-PL1 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | 0k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Olympus E-PL1
EX2F | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | May 2010 | More recent by 31 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Samsung EX2F
E-PL1 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PL1 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL1 features physical dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) whilst the Samsung EX2F has specifications of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL1 and Samsung EX2F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the E-PL1 versus the EX2F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL1 and EX2F is 86 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements only by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL1 and EX2F.
Clearly, the two cameras offer the same exact resolution albeit different sensor measurements. The E-PL1 has got the bigger sensor which is going to make getting bokeh easier. The older E-PL1 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL1 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Samsung EX2F |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-05-17 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Truepic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/1.4-2.7 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 0k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 334 grams (0.74 lbs) | 294 grams (0.65 lbs) |
Dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 54 | 48 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 487 | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $288 | $478 |