Olympus E-PL1 vs Samsung MV800
86 Imaging
46 Features
43 Overall
44
97 Imaging
38 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus E-PL1 vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Introduced May 2010
- Newer Model is Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Revealed September 2011
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-PL1 vs Samsung MV800 Overview
Below is a extended review of the Olympus E-PL1 vs Samsung MV800, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL1 (12MP) and MV800 (16MP) and the E-PL1 (Four Thirds) and MV800 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-PL1 was launched 15 months earlier than the MV800 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung MV800 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-PL1 scores against the MV800 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-PL1 vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL1 and Samsung MV800. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL1 Gallery and Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Samsung MV800
| E-PL1 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Olympus E-PL1
| MV800 | E-PL1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2011 | May 2010 | More recent by 15 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1 and Samsung MV800
| E-PL1 | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL1 vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL1 offers exterior dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) whilst the Samsung MV800 has sizing of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL1 vs Samsung MV800 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-PL1 and the MV800.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL1 and MV800 is 86 and 97 respectively.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements just by going through technical specs. The visual here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL1 and MV800.
As you have seen, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PL1 because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Samsung MV800 will provide more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs more aggressively. The older E-PL1 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL1 vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-PL1 vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Samsung MV800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | Samsung MV800 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-05-17 | 2011-09-01 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Truepic V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 334 gr (0.74 lbs) | 121 gr (0.27 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 54 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 487 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 290 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLS-1 | BP70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card | Micro SD |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $288 | $499 |