Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10c2f/10c2fc55195237e69fad4f95871fa6ff43ec81c2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1s front Olympus PEN E-PL1s front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88d49/88d491f346db87b2f72053243d7a55b3e85bdf50" alt="Olympus SH-50 front Olympus SH-50 front"
88 Imaging
39 Features
48 Overall
42
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Revealed November 2010
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL1
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 Overview
Below is a extensive analysis of the Olympus E-PL1s versus Olympus SH-50, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-PL1s (12MP) and SH-50 (16MP) and the E-PL1s (Four Thirds) and SH-50 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-PL1s was unveiled 3 years earlier than the SH-50 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL1s being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-50 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-PL1s scores versus the SH-50 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL1s & Olympus SH-50. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL1s Gallery & Olympus SH-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Olympus SH-50
E-PL1s | SH-50 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Olympus E-PL1s
SH-50 | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | November 2010 | More recent by 26 months |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1s and Olympus SH-50
E-PL1s | SH-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL1s has got external measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) and the Olympus SH-50 has dimensions of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL1s versus Olympus SH-50 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-PL1s vs the SH-50.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1a84/c1a84b539375f5a49a39a445ee7bbd85dfc68557" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL1s and SH-50 is 86 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3309f/3309fbdfaa40f0359d0d68b57fd60ea3545562a0" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements simply by going over specs. The photograph here may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL1s and SH-50.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PL1s having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus SH-50 will offer extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older E-PL1s is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0d7b/b0d7bfe6b422ea7778f817ccd297fc6239c08d12" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/baea7/baea7a143f3bc92e6eec883c9a9144661026264f" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Olympus SH-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Olympus SH-50 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-11-16 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic V | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 15 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 334 gr (0.74 lb) | 269 gr (0.59 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $599 | $300 |