Clicky

Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
43
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-PL1s front
 
Olympus SH-50 front
Portability
88
Imaging
40
Features
48
Overall
43

Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
  • Revealed November 2010
  • Replaced the Olympus E-PL1
  • Renewed by Olympus E-PL2
Olympus SH-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
  • 269g - 112 x 63 x 42mm
  • Launched January 2013
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 Overview

Below is a extensive analysis of the Olympus E-PL1s versus Olympus SH-50, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-PL1s (12MP) and SH-50 (16MP) and the E-PL1s (Four Thirds) and SH-50 (1/2.3") boast different sensor measurements.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-PL1s was unveiled 3 years earlier than the SH-50 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL1s being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-50 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-PL1s scores versus the SH-50 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Olympus SH-50

 E-PL1s SH-50 

Reasons to pick Olympus SH-50 over the Olympus E-PL1s

 SH-50 E-PL1s 
LaunchedJanuary 2013November 2010More recent by 26 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-PL1s and Olympus SH-50

 E-PL1s SH-50 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL1s has got external measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) and the Olympus SH-50 has dimensions of 112mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-PL1s versus Olympus SH-50 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-PL1s vs the SH-50.

Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL1s and SH-50 is 86 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements simply by going over specs. The photograph here may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL1s and SH-50.

As you can plainly see, both of those cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PL1s having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus SH-50 will offer extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older E-PL1s is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL1s Portrait photography highlights
Olympus SH-50 Portrait photography highlights
60
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focus
exports RAW formats
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
44
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect focus
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL1s Street photography features
Olympus SH-50 Street photography features
74
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
64
has image stabilization (Optical)
has focus via touch
lighter than average in class (269 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-PL1s
Sports photography with Olympus SH-50
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
max fps very slow (3.0 fps)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
bad battery power (290 shots)
has no phase detect auto focus
48
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking focus
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL1s Travel photography highlights
Olympus SH-50 Travel photography highlights
51
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
bad battery power (290 shots)
low megapixels (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
69
lighter than average in class (269 grams)
has focus via touch
good MP (16MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (25mm)
long zoom (600mm)
does not have Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL1s Landscape photography factors
Olympus SH-50 Landscape photography factors
55
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is small (2.7 inches)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
bad battery power (290 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse mode
49
has manual focus
quite wide (25mm)
good sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
does not have Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL1s Vlogging factors
Olympus SH-50 Vlogging factors
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detect focus
screen is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic port
34
quite wide (25mm)
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than average in class (269 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have microphone support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-50 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL1s and Olympus SH-50
 Olympus PEN E-PL1sOlympus SH-50
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus PEN E-PL1s Olympus SH-50
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2010-11-16 2013-01-08
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Truepic V TruePic VI
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 125
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.0-6.9
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 15 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 12.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 10.00 m 4.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/160 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 334 gr (0.74 lb) 269 gr (0.59 lb)
Physical dimensions 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 112 x 63 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 290 photos -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-1 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $599 $300