Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SP-565UZ
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10c2f/10c2fc55195237e69fad4f95871fa6ff43ec81c2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1s front Olympus PEN E-PL1s front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be5cc/be5cc451a0cb5e5cd135984cda3377e059d9849e" alt="Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front"
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Announced November 2010
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL1
- Successor is Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus E-PL1s and Olympus SP-565UZ, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are produced by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL1s (12MP) and the SP-565UZ (10MP) is very well matched but the E-PL1s (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-PL1s was released 23 months later than the SP-565UZ making them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL1s being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-PL1s grades versus the SP-565UZ with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL1s & Olympus SP-565UZ. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL1s Gallery & Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-PL1s | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 23 months |
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-PL1s
SP-565UZ | E-PL1s |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1s and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-PL1s | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL1s enjoys external dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has sizing of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL1s and Olympus SP-565UZ in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-PL1s and the SP-565UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea61c/ea61cda99f1493d2757d0dc64b632dc3a246bb7c" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL1s and SP-565UZ is 86 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9301/d930193f5b1a1f1c9b6ece5817d6924da75da579" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading through technical specs. The graphic underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL1s and SP-565UZ.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PL1s because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PL1s will give you extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The more modern E-PL1s provides an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cfb2/3cfb201692e3d403f80b93bb3897269e89662aff" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a30ce/a30ce64c12329b20555e09c1e480ea0b4a52a58e" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-11-16 | 2009-01-15 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Truepic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 334 gr (0.74 lbs) | 413 gr (0.91 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 30 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $599 | $400 |