Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-2
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10c2f/10c2fc55195237e69fad4f95871fa6ff43ec81c2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1s front Olympus PEN E-PL1s front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac7d4/ac7d4b646d82f72e1235bc9a541f3ccc1d146b3c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-2 front Olympus Stylus SH-2 front"
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Released November 2010
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL1
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced March 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-1
- Updated by Olympus SH-3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-2, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the E-PL1s (12MP) and SH-2 (16MP) and the E-PL1s (Four Thirds) and SH-2 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-PL1s was brought out 5 years prior to the SH-2 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL1s being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-PL1s matches up versus the SH-2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL1s & Olympus Stylus SH-2. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL1s Gallery & Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Olympus SH-2
E-PL1s | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus E-PL1s
SH-2 | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2015 | ![]() | November 2010 | More modern by 52 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1s and Olympus SH-2
E-PL1s | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL1s has got physical dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) and the Olympus SH-2 has measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-PL1s compared to the SH-2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b150d/b150d748508fe88207f170c63bc480352a1c941c" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL1s and SH-2 is 86 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f72e8/f72e80e4106d7d52d4df507bbdd09b06dfa130a6" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The image underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL1s and SH-2.
As you have seen, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-PL1s featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus SH-2 will resolve more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged E-PL1s is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bb5d/7bb5de6273d15f70e8aff7f014a118276a2bc754" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c8be/0c8bec156597f36b0921d783c3c6322c4505c87d" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-11-16 | 2015-03-11 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Truepic V | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 11.5 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 334g (0.74 lb) | 271g (0.60 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photos | 380 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $599 | $399 |