Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10c2f/10c2fc55195237e69fad4f95871fa6ff43ec81c2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1s front Olympus PEN E-PL1s front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Revealed November 2010
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL1
- New Model is Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-PL1s and Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-PL1s (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is pretty close but the E-PL1s (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-PL1s was unveiled 14 months prior to the TG-820 iHS which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL1s being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-PL1s scores against the TG-820 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL1s & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL1s Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-PL1s | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-PL1s
TG-820 iHS | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | ![]() | November 2010 | Newer by 14 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1s and Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-PL1s | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL1s comes with outer measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has specifications of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL1s and Olympus TG-820 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the E-PL1s against the TG-820 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/400d8/400d89c482cd00e154cf9c4c9f8544f6c607a042" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL1s and TG-820 iHS is 86 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c6df/3c6dfe0f908b3403ae9a3243f359373269cdebda" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by looking through technical specs. The picture here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL1s and TG-820 iHS.
As you can tell, the two cameras have got the exact same MP albeit different sensor dimensions. The E-PL1s has got the bigger sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow DOF simpler. The more aged E-PL1s will be behind in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/192de/192de001c5d0207f049f67bc85715154ac1b5e2d" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d3d3/9d3d338fefbaa7bfd8a24c1edb53414e09772cca" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2010-11-16 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Truepic V | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 334 gr (0.74 pounds) | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 shots | 220 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $599 | $500 |