Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10c2f/10c2fc55195237e69fad4f95871fa6ff43ec81c2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1s front Olympus PEN E-PL1s front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e50f/1e50fad8a32efe751efae0d6317d26784ad1ed5c" alt="Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Announced November 2010
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and they are both built by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PL1s (12MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is very well matched but the E-PL1s (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") have different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-PL1s was introduced 3 years before the TG-2 iHS and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL1s being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-PL1s scores vs the TG-2 iHS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL1s & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PL1s Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-PL1s | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-PL1s
TG-2 iHS | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2013 | ![]() | November 2010 | Fresher by 31 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1s and Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-PL1s | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera, you have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL1s features external dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-2 iHS has proportions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-PL1s versus the TG-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afb0c/afb0c925e0f5c7d04c3ba9965a2297e8769e30af" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL1s and TG-2 iHS is 86 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37d62/37d6208d5416ef27eb579c0ecb7fc5f50e0b7c39" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by looking at specifications. The photograph here will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL1s and TG-2 iHS.
Plainly, both the cameras have the same resolution but different sensor sizing. The E-PL1s has the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallower DOF easier. The older E-PL1s is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9bbb/d9bbbbc3454ff620e5f8819f41d1c6e5c6143dbc" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba1c1/ba1c1b981043011377a865d968355aa4097d070e" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2010-11-16 | 2013-06-28 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 610k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 334 gr (0.74 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 pictures | 350 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-1 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $599 | $380 |