Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VR-330
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10c2f/10c2fc55195237e69fad4f95871fa6ff43ec81c2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1s front Olympus PEN E-PL1s front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b65f6/b65f6bde8fac08d49d3f08ec42b6ae4217524297" alt="Olympus VR-330 front Olympus VR-330 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Introduced November 2010
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL1
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus VR-320
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Olympus E-PL1s and Olympus VR-330, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both built by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PL1s (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is fairly similar but the E-PL1s (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") feature different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-PL1s was unveiled 2 months before the VR-330 and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL1s being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-PL1s matches up against the VR-330 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL1s & Olympus VR-330. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-PL1s Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Olympus VR-330
E-PL1s | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-PL1s
VR-330 | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1s and Olympus VR-330
E-PL1s | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2010 | ![]() | February 2011 | Similar age |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL1s features exterior measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL1s and Olympus VR-330 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the E-PL1s vs the VR-330.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a85cd/a85cd7766c4b90098572c85984e856c4bc6640d0" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL1s and VR-330 is 86 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c5b9/2c5b9228d3f0acef03d37064582effa292fb6b61" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements purely by reviewing technical specs. The photograph below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL1s and VR-330.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PL1s using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus VR-330 will deliver extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7434b/7434bca12194b82b8e6cc9ce1f80b5e3b8907f1d" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d704c/d704ce54c8f7bc19a901f7af837d77e219d71b2e" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Olympus VR-330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Olympus VR-330 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2010-11-16 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Truepic V | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 334 gr (0.74 lb) | 158 gr (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $599 | $220 |