Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS200
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched November 2010
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL1
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Announced February 2018
- Alternate Name is Lumix DC-TZ200
- Previous Model is Panasonic ZS100
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
The following is a extensive comparison of the Olympus E-PL1s and Panasonic ZS200, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-PL1s (12MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the E-PL1s (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") posses different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-PL1s was manufactured 8 years earlier than the ZS200 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL1s being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-PL1s scores vs the ZS200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL1s & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL1s Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Panasonic ZS200
E-PL1s | ZS200 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-PL1s
ZS200 | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2018 | November 2010 | Newer by 88 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1010k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1s and Panasonic ZS200
E-PL1s | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL1s enjoys physical measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS200 has specifications of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") having a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PL1s and Panasonic ZS200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL1s and the ZS200.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL1s and ZS200 is 86 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions only by looking at specifications. The image here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL1s and ZS200.
Plainly, both of the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL1s featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Panasonic ZS200 will give you extra detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged E-PL1s is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-11-16 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Truepic V | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 334g (0.74 lb) | 340g (0.75 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photos | 370 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $599 | $800 |