Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic FX48
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10c2f/10c2fc55195237e69fad4f95871fa6ff43ec81c2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1s front Olympus PEN E-PL1s front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a7a1/8a7a180937ea0d2aac292604a641c6ce9f80a13b" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic FX48 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Announced November 2010
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL1
- Successor is Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 25-125mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 150g - 95 x 53 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FX40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic FX48 Overview
Here is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-PL1s versus Panasonic FX48, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-PL1s (12MP) and the FX48 (12MP) is very comparable but the E-PL1s (Four Thirds) and FX48 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-PL1s was unveiled 22 months later than the FX48 making them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL1s being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX48 being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-PL1s scores versus the FX48 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic FX48 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL1s & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL1s Gallery & Panasonic FX48 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Panasonic FX48
E-PL1s | FX48 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 22 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX48 over the Olympus E-PL1s
FX48 | E-PL1s |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1s and Panasonic FX48
E-PL1s | FX48 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic FX48 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL1s has external dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX48 has sizing of 95mm x 53mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL1s versus Panasonic FX48 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the E-PL1s against the FX48.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd5e0/dd5e0acd3a00c65b4665cdb8116f51e3938461ef" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic FX48 size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic FX48 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL1s and FX48 is 86 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b34a3/b34a3726f030715a2bba634de62491dbe36295e2" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic FX48 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic FX48 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic FX48 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing merely by seeing technical specs. The visual here should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL1s and FX48.
As you can tell, both cameras feature the identical resolution but not the same sensor sizing. The E-PL1s includes the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler. The more recent E-PL1s will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7db0a/7db0a439f9e9b64094b2c268cd90f7cf534e4a84" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic FX48 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic FX48 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ddbd/3ddbd626237cf9508b6a5d003b625cc8256fc5a0" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic FX48 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic FX48 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX48 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX40 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2010-11-16 | 2009-01-27 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Truepic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 334g (0.74 pounds) | 150g (0.33 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 95 x 53 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $599 | $325 |