Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS3
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10c2f/10c2fc55195237e69fad4f95871fa6ff43ec81c2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1s front Olympus PEN E-PL1s front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/91d60/91d606f8f15554d192c44ec0e68c877e6a1eff9a" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 front"
91 Imaging
33 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched November 2010
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL1
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 229g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Released May 2009
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ7
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS3 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS3, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-PL1s (12MP) and the ZS3 (10MP) is fairly comparable but the E-PL1s (Four Thirds) and ZS3 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-PL1s was manufactured 19 months after the ZS3 making them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL1s being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS3 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a full comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-PL1s matches up against the ZS3 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL1s & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL1s Gallery & Panasonic ZS3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Panasonic ZS3
E-PL1s | ZS3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2010 | ![]() | May 2009 | More modern by 19 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS3 over the Olympus E-PL1s
ZS3 | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1s and Panasonic ZS3
E-PL1s | ZS3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS3 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you should think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL1s enjoys outer measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS3 has specifications of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 229 grams (0.50 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-PL1s vs the ZS3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21b33/21b33ef98b2db476e61dd7132c854b4d5d2bd23f" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS3 size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS3 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL1s and ZS3 is 86 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4d85/b4d8586ee2fb6f55aad4582e10fa7d96c3503cf9" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS3 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to see the difference in sensor sizes simply by going through specs. The image below might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL1s and ZS3.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PL1s featuring a larger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-PL1s will provide greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-PL1s is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec6a8/ec6a82ee432a5642a4b5430efd5d4ecd06837b08" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS3 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f124a/f124a3e9a08ddd85f7b8a0a2b6a0545bbe854750" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS3 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS3 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ7 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2010-11-16 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-300mm (12.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 5.30 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 334 grams (0.74 pounds) | 229 grams (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $599 | $200 |