Clicky

Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35

Portability
86
Imaging
48
Features
43
Overall
46
Olympus PEN E-PL1s front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 front
Portability
89
Imaging
40
Features
50
Overall
44

Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
  • Revealed November 2010
  • Replaced the Olympus E-PL1
  • Successor is Olympus E-PL2
Panasonic ZS35
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
  • Revealed January 2014
  • Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
  • Old Model is Panasonic ZS30
  • Newer Model is Panasonic ZS40
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview

Following is a thorough overview of the Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the E-PL1s (12MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-PL1s (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-PL1s was introduced 4 years earlier than the ZS35 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL1s being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.

Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-PL1s scores vs the ZS35 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Panasonic ZS35

 E-PL1s ZS35 
Manually focus Very accurate focus

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-PL1s

 ZS35 E-PL1s 
RevealedJanuary 2014November 2010More modern by 38 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-PL1s and Panasonic ZS35

 E-PL1s ZS35 
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL1s provides external dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS35 has sizing of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-PL1s and the ZS35.

Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL1s and ZS35 is 86 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor sizes only by researching technical specs. The image here will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL1s and ZS35.

As you have seen, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PL1s with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic ZS35 will render greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged E-PL1s will be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-PL1s
Portrait photography with Panasonic ZS35
60
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
low MP (12 megapixels)
37
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
comes with face detect focusing
focusing manually not possible
can't use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-PL1s
Street photography with Panasonic ZS35
74
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
68
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (305g)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-PL1s
Sports photography with Panasonic ZS35
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
low MP (12MP)
low battery (290 per charge)
has no phase detect autofocus
53
incredible zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL1s as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic ZS35 as a Travel photography camera
52
has built in flash
missing Timelapse recording
low battery (290 CIPA)
low MP (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
68
lighter than others in class (305g)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
very long zoom (480mm)
missing Timelapse mode
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL1s Landscape photography factors
Panasonic ZS35 Landscape photography factors
55
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
low MP (12MP)
low battery (290 shots)
missing Timelapse recording
44
really wide (24mm)
screen is a decent size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-PL1s
Vlogging with Panasonic ZS35
30
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detection autofocus
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external microphone socket
34
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than others in class (305 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
missing microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL1s and Panasonic ZS35
 Olympus PEN E-PL1sPanasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus PEN E-PL1s Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35
Otherwise known as - Lumix DMC-TZ55
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2010-11-16 2014-01-06
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Truepic V -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Highest boosted ISO - 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 11 21
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-480mm (20.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.3-6.4
Macro focus range - 3cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 10.00 m 6.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/160 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 334 gr (0.74 lbs) 305 gr (0.67 lbs)
Physical dimensions 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 290 shots -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $599 $300