Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
89 Imaging
40 Features
50 Overall
44
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Revealed November 2010
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL1
- Successor is Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 305g - 107 x 62 x 32mm
- Revealed January 2014
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ55
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS30
- Newer Model is Panasonic ZS40
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35 Overview
Following is a thorough overview of the Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the E-PL1s (12MP) and ZS35 (16MP) and the E-PL1s (Four Thirds) and ZS35 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-PL1s was introduced 4 years earlier than the ZS35 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL1s being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS35 being a Compact camera.
Before getting into a in depth comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-PL1s scores vs the ZS35 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL1s & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL1s Gallery & Panasonic ZS35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Panasonic ZS35
E-PL1s | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS35 over the Olympus E-PL1s
ZS35 | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | November 2010 | More modern by 38 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1s and Panasonic ZS35
E-PL1s | ZS35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL1s provides external dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS35 has sizing of 107mm x 62mm x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-PL1s and the ZS35.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL1s and ZS35 is 86 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to see the gap in sensor sizes only by researching technical specs. The image here will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL1s and ZS35.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PL1s with its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Panasonic ZS35 will render greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged E-PL1s will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL1s vs Panasonic ZS35 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS35 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ55 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-11-16 | 2014-01-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Truepic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT LCD (180 degree tilt) with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 334 gr (0.74 lbs) | 305 gr (0.67 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 107 x 62 x 32mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $599 | $300 |