Olympus E-PL1s vs Pentax K200D
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10c2f/10c2fc55195237e69fad4f95871fa6ff43ec81c2" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL1s front Olympus PEN E-PL1s front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94ff5/94ff5a51162be558964f8f43fe832dff1cbdccd0" alt="Pentax K200D front Pentax K200D front"
61 Imaging
49 Features
41 Overall
45
Olympus E-PL1s vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Introduced November 2010
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL1
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Introduced September 2008
- Earlier Model is Pentax K100D S
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Pentax K200D Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus E-PL1s versus Pentax K200D, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-PL1s (12MP) and the K200D (10MP) is relatively similar but the E-PL1s (Four Thirds) and K200D (APS-C) have totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-PL1s was brought out 2 years later than the K200D and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL1s being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-PL1s grades against the K200D with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Pentax K200D Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL1s and Pentax K200D. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL1s Gallery and Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Pentax K200D
E-PL1s | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2010 | ![]() | September 2008 | More recent by 27 months |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus E-PL1s
K200D | E-PL1s |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL1s and Pentax K200D
E-PL1s | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | No Touch screen |
Olympus E-PL1s vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL1s comes with outer measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) while the Pentax K200D has measurements of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") and a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL1s versus Pentax K200D in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-PL1s versus the K200D.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d2a0/0d2a02a49ee38c2f3ffdc9e292e5b442213c82aa" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Pentax K200D size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Pentax K200D size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL1s and K200D is 86 and 61 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25c4a/25c4a699c74ce36d144e3350074a25550eef68da" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Pentax K200D top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Pentax K200D top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over specifications. The graphic here will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL1s and K200D.
Plainly, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PL1s featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus E-PL1s will deliver extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher E-PL1s will have an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f07fa/f07faa2dacbea03202587c0eae4b3cf8b6368b09" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Pentax K200D sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Pentax K200D sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL1s vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4face/4faceb6e934b34f7df59e54edc12f97836b72b26" alt="Olympus E-PL1s vs Pentax K200D Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL1s vs Pentax K200D Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL1s vs Pentax K200D Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Pentax K200D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | Pentax K200D |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2010-11-16 | 2008-09-01 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Truepic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Number of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/160 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 334g (0.74 lbs) | 690g (1.52 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 561 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-1 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $599 | $600 |