Clicky

Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
43
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-PL1s front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
47
Overall
39

Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
  • Introduced November 2010
  • Superseded the Olympus E-PL1
  • Successor is Olympus E-PL2
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Announced September 2011
  • Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

Lets look much closer at the Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-PL1s (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is pretty close but the E-PL1s (Four Thirds) and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") offer different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-PL1s was brought out 10 months earlier than the GR Digital IV so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL1s being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-PL1s matches up versus the GR Digital IV when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 E-PL1s GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus E-PL1s

 GR Digital IV E-PL1s 
AnnouncedSeptember 2011November 2010Fresher by 10 months
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1230k230kCrisper screen (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-PL1s and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 E-PL1s GR Digital IV 
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither offers Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL1s offers exterior measurements of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-PL1s and the GR Digital IV.

Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL1s and GR Digital IV is 86 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Normally, its tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL1s and GR Digital IV.

As you can see, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL1s featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-PL1s will result in greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older E-PL1s will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL1s Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography highlights
60
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
features face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
40
has manual focus
saves RAW files
low megapixels (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL1s Street photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography highlights
74
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
no moving screen
64
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL1s Sports photography factors
Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography factors
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
max fps very slow (3.0 frames per second)
megapixel count low (12MP)
low battery (290 shots)
lack of phase detect AF
33
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
great battery (390 per charge)
can't change focal length (28mm)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
has no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL1s Travel photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography advice
51
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse function
low battery (290 shots)
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
67
great battery (390 per charge)
built-in flash
good max aperture (f1.9)
low megapixels (10MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL1s Landscape photography factors
Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography factors
55
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
low battery (290 per charge)
lack of Timelapse function
52
has manual focus
good max aperture (f1.9)
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
great battery (390 per charge)
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
low megapixels (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL1s Vlogging advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging advice
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
features face detection focusing
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone port
29
good max aperture (f1.9)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-PL1s vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL1s and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Olympus PEN E-PL1sRicoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus PEN E-PL1s Ricoh GR Digital IV
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2010-11-16 2011-09-15
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Truepic V -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 4032 x 3024 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28mm (1x)
Maximum aperture - f/1.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7" 3"
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 1 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 10.00 m 3.00 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/160 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 334 grams (0.74 lb) 190 grams (0.42 lb)
Physical dimensions 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 290 pictures 390 pictures
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-1 DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $599 $599