Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
![Olympus PEN E-PL2 front Olympus PEN E-PL2 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-PEN-E-PL2/Olympus-E-PL2-front.jpg)
![Olympus SP-565UZ front Olympus SP-565UZ front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-SP-565UZ/Olympus-SP-565UZ-front.jpg)
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL1s
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Below is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus SP-565UZ, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL2 (12MP) and the SP-565UZ (10MP) is pretty close but the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The E-PL2 was launched 2 years later than the SP-565UZ and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-PL2 matches up vs the SP-565UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL2 and Olympus SP-565UZ. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-PL2 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 26 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-PL2
SP-565UZ | E-PL2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-PL2 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL2 features outside dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has specifications of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus SP-565UZ in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-PL2 against the SP-565UZ.
![Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-PEN-E-PL2-vs-Olympus-SP-565UZ-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL2 and SP-565UZ is 85 and 72 respectively.
![Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-PEN-E-PL2-vs-Olympus-SP-565UZ-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through technical specs. The photograph underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL2 and SP-565UZ.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL2 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-PL2 will render extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The more recent E-PL2 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
![Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-PEN-E-PL2-vs-Olympus-SP-565UZ-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-PEN-E-PL2-vs-Olympus-SP-565UZ-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-02-11 | 2009-01-15 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Truepic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 362 grams (0.80 pounds) | 413 grams (0.91 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | 30 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.2 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 573 | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $0 | $400 |