Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ
85 Imaging
48 Features
47 Overall
47
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL1s
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Released January 2009
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Overview
Below is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus SP-565UZ, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL2 (12MP) and the SP-565UZ (10MP) is pretty close but the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and SP-565UZ (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-PL2 was launched 2 years later than the SP-565UZ and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-565UZ being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief summation of how the E-PL2 matches up vs the SP-565UZ with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL2 and Olympus SP-565UZ. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery and Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
E-PL2 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2011 | January 2009 | More recent by 26 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Olympus E-PL2
SP-565UZ | E-PL2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus SP-565UZ
E-PL2 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL2 features outside dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) while the Olympus SP-565UZ has specifications of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") having a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus SP-565UZ in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-PL2 against the SP-565UZ.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL2 and SP-565UZ is 85 and 72 respectively.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through technical specs. The photograph underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL2 and SP-565UZ.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL2 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-PL2 will render extra detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The more recent E-PL2 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus SP-565UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus SP-565UZ |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-02-11 | 2009-01-15 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Truepic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-520mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 1 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 6.40 m (ISO 200) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 362 grams (0.80 pounds) | 413 grams (0.91 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | 30 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | 18.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.2 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 573 | 68 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | xD Picture Card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $0 | $400 |