Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0db25/0db25b50f5db0e38bf19b46696bb0e06a463d704" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL2 front Olympus PEN E-PL2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e15b/5e15bbd13d20cd8ec38f10fc405eeba9ee72db5a" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ front Olympus SP-620 UZ front"
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched February 2011
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL1s
- Successor is Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Launched January 2012
- Superseded the Olympus SP-610UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Overview
Below, we are comparing the Olympus E-PL2 versus Olympus SP-620 UZ, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and SP-620 UZ (16MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and SP-620 UZ (1/2.3") use different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-PL2 was released 11 months before the SP-620 UZ so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-620 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-PL2 scores vs the SP-620 UZ in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL2 & Olympus SP-620 UZ. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery & Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
E-PL2 | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Olympus E-PL2
SP-620 UZ | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | February 2011 | Fresher by 11 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus SP-620 UZ
E-PL2 | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL2 has got external dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-620 UZ has measurements of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL2 versus Olympus SP-620 UZ in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-PL2 versus the SP-620 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d944/6d94494f54a51148970b7bded6364f63432491b4" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL2 and SP-620 UZ is 85 and 78 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b41b7/b41b70a42aa076a595478dcd624f3345e8b71ed3" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizing just by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL2 and SP-620 UZ.
As you can see, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-PL2 featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Olympus SP-620 UZ will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older E-PL2 will be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73208/732085b28fa36eb8246b2c1ea1870b9a3e1419d6" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/885f4/885f498e89b1da5708280e2b332c2e5aa5d2e75d" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus SP-620 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus SP-620 UZ |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2011-02-11 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic V | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-525mm (21.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.1-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 362 gr (0.80 lb) | 435 gr (0.96 lb) |
Dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $0 | $199 |