Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ
85 Imaging
48 Features
47 Overall
47
69 Imaging
36 Features
35 Overall
35
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Released February 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL1s
- New Model is Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Expand to 1000)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-840mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 455g - 110 x 90 x 91mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Renewed by Olympus SP-810 UZ
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus SP-800 UZ, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-PL2 (12MP) and the SP-800 UZ (14MP) is relatively comparable but the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and SP-800 UZ (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-PL2 was announced 13 months later than the SP-800 UZ which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-800 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-PL2 matches up vs the SP-800 UZ with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL2 & Olympus SP-800 UZ. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery & Olympus SP-800 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-PL2 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2011 | February 2010 | More recent by 13 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-800 UZ over the Olympus E-PL2
SP-800 UZ | E-PL2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus SP-800 UZ
E-PL2 | SP-800 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL2 comes with outside measurements of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) whilst the Olympus SP-800 UZ has measurements of 110mm x 90mm x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") along with a weight of 455 grams (1.00 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus SP-800 UZ in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-PL2 compared to the SP-800 UZ.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL2 and SP-800 UZ is 85 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements merely by checking out specs. The visual here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL2 and SP-800 UZ.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PL2 with its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus SP-800 UZ will show more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more modern E-PL2 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-800 UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus SP-800 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus SP-800 UZ |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2011-02-11 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Truepic V | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 1000 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 143 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-840mm (30.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 12 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 362 grams (0.80 lbs) | 455 grams (1.00 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 110 x 90 x 91mm (4.3" x 3.5" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $0 | $270 |