Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0db25/0db25b50f5db0e38bf19b46696bb0e06a463d704" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL2 front Olympus PEN E-PL2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0063/e00637e5677671b8b72fa1976b25d95bb3a79c37" alt="Olympus SP-810 UZ front Olympus SP-810 UZ front"
78 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL1s
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-864mm (F2.9-5.7) lens
- 413g - 106 x 76 x 74mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Older Model is Olympus SP-800 UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Overview
Here is a detailed review of the Olympus E-PL2 versus Olympus SP-810 UZ, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both sold by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL2 (12MP) and the SP-810 UZ (14MP) is fairly close but the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and SP-810 UZ (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-PL2 was announced 5 months before the SP-810 UZ so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-810 UZ being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-PL2 grades vs the SP-810 UZ with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL2 & Olympus SP-810 UZ. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery & Olympus SP-810 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus SP-810 UZ
E-PL2 | SP-810 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-810 UZ over the Olympus E-PL2
SP-810 UZ | E-PL2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus SP-810 UZ
E-PL2 | SP-810 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2011 | ![]() | July 2011 | Same age |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL2 comes with physical dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) while the Olympus SP-810 UZ has specifications of 106mm x 76mm x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL2 versus Olympus SP-810 UZ in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the E-PL2 versus the SP-810 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4dc0a/4dc0aa36d3fc1a0df18e41a2580f0057bc37873d" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL2 and SP-810 UZ is 85 and 78 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd137/cd137c72669af1d05752d5c2545db212388899e9" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing merely by viewing specifications. The photograph below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL2 and SP-810 UZ.
To sum up, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL2 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus SP-810 UZ will result in extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e13e/7e13e8b2e1e77bdc79a162490cab93c5a818bc4b" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5761/b5761cdee9ae9575cf9449cf39e009581460ec6d" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SP-810 UZ Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus SP-810 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus SP-810 UZ |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2011-02-11 | 2011-07-27 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Truepic V | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-864mm (36.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.9-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 1/4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1200s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 0.7 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 6.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 362 gr (0.80 pounds) | 413 gr (0.91 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 106 x 76 x 74mm (4.2" x 3.0" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 or 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $0 | $280 |