Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0db25/0db25b50f5db0e38bf19b46696bb0e06a463d704" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL2 front Olympus PEN E-PL2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7e21/a7e2113adb5f22cfd856c9b9ebf2ca5403c26cd4" alt="Olympus SZ-16 iHS front Olympus SZ-16 iHS front"
89 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL1s
- Newer Model is Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 226g - 108 x 70 x 40mm
- Revealed January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and SZ-16 iHS (16MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and SZ-16 iHS (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-PL2 was brought out 23 months prior to the SZ-16 iHS which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SZ-16 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the E-PL2 matches up vs the SZ-16 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL2 & Olympus SZ-16 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery & Olympus SZ-16 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus SZ-16 iHS
E-PL2 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SZ-16 iHS over the Olympus E-PL2
SZ-16 iHS | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | February 2011 | Fresher by 23 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus SZ-16 iHS
E-PL2 | SZ-16 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Identical screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL2 has physical measurements of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) whilst the Olympus SZ-16 iHS has sizing of 108mm x 70mm x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-PL2 versus the SZ-16 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ee0b/5ee0b9ae36218cfafeb1472040435258c8109730" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL2 and SZ-16 iHS is 85 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfc6f/bfc6f42c4a73d8c79989f3110b431cd84dee431d" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing simply by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL2 and SZ-16 iHS.
Clearly, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-PL2 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus SZ-16 iHS will render greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The older E-PL2 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c2b7/6c2b7f692863c362e66ec1242c2c1a262b1b61da" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/693e4/693e4b9edf016a814528d481ff3ccfe39ba0bd60" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SZ-16 iHS Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus SZ-16 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus SZ-16 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-02-11 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Truepic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 362 grams (0.80 pounds) | 226 grams (0.50 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 108 x 70 x 40mm (4.3" x 2.8" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 pictures | 220 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $0 | $230 |