Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-2
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0db25/0db25b50f5db0e38bf19b46696bb0e06a463d704" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL2 front Olympus PEN E-PL2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac7d4/ac7d4b646d82f72e1235bc9a541f3ccc1d146b3c" alt="Olympus Stylus SH-2 front Olympus Stylus SH-2 front"
88 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL1s
- New Model is Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched March 2015
- Old Model is Olympus SH-1
- Renewed by Olympus SH-3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-2, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are designed by Olympus. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and SH-2 (16MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and SH-2 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-PL2 was launched 5 years prior to the SH-2 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-PL2 grades versus the SH-2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL2 and Olympus Stylus SH-2. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery and Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus SH-2
E-PL2 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Olympus E-PL2
SH-2 | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2015 | ![]() | February 2011 | More modern by 49 months |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus SH-2
E-PL2 | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL2 has outer dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) and the Olympus SH-2 has proportions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-2 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-PL2 versus the SH-2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a2c1/6a2c1d5bbad3929337a8e71f30cacfc6e42f208f" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-2 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL2 and SH-2 is 85 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5870f/5870fe9339e6f4331873f22d3d73a9d32112ad87" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL2 and SH-2.
As you can see, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-PL2 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus SH-2 will render more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-PL2 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/609b2/609b2dbdaf8e96b0289c642153c3f8a1be7f3ad6" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fa5a/1fa5a659c959a311c65c03cabafb508d12ef2899" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2011-02-11 | 2015-03-11 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Truepic V | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 11.5 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 362 grams (0.80 lbs) | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) |
Dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 photos | 380 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $0 | $399 |