Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus Tough-3000
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0db25/0db25b50f5db0e38bf19b46696bb0e06a463d704" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL2 front Olympus PEN E-PL2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Announced February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL1s
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Launched January 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus Tough-3000, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both designed by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL2 (12MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is pretty well matched but the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and Tough-3000 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-PL2 was announced 14 months later than the Tough-3000 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus Tough-3000 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a full comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-PL2 matches up vs the Tough-3000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL2 & Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery & Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus Tough-3000
E-PL2 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2011 | ![]() | January 2010 | Fresher by 14 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Olympus E-PL2
Tough-3000 | E-PL2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus Tough-3000
E-PL2 | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL2 has got outside dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) whilst the Olympus Tough-3000 has dimensions of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the E-PL2 versus the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f812/1f8122a71051eb35eb484cb05e1e0e94fc887e3a" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL2 and Tough-3000 is 85 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a4bb/4a4bb384ef9bca6f35aa3009ce6da42f75bdb6ef" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizing simply by checking a spec sheet. The photograph below might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL2 and Tough-3000.
Clearly, the two cameras posses the exact same megapixels albeit different sensor sizing. The E-PL2 includes the bigger sensor which should make obtaining shallower DOF simpler. The more modern E-PL2 provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7ead/f7ead10f8deea90773319ebe325c015a74dd1de2" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7ba5/d7ba566c58e237a9279af1d4cf7d8590339526bf" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Alternate name | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2011-02-11 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Truepic V | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus range | - | 2cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 362 grams (0.80 lb) | 159 grams (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $0 | $0 |