Clicky

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 6000

Portability
85
Imaging
48
Features
47
Overall
47
Olympus PEN E-PL2 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough 6000 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
21
Overall
28

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 6000 Key Specs

Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
  • Revealed February 2011
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-PL1s
  • Successor is Olympus E-PL3
Olympus 6000
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 50 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 179g - 95 x 63 x 22mm
  • Released July 2009
  • Other Name is mju Tough 6000
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 6000 Overview

Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-PL2 versus Olympus 6000, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are built by Olympus. The resolution of the E-PL2 (12MP) and the 6000 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and 6000 (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-PL2 was revealed 20 months after the 6000 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 6000 being a Compact camera.

Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-PL2 grades vs the 6000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus 6000

 E-PL2 6000 
ReleasedFebruary 2011July 2009More modern by 20 months
Manually focus More accurate focus
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus 6000 over the Olympus E-PL2

 6000 E-PL2 

Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus 6000

 E-PL2 6000 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 6000 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL2 has got external measurements of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) and the Olympus 6000 has proportions of 95mm x 63mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-PL2 versus Olympus 6000 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-PL2 versus the 6000.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 6000 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL2 and 6000 is 85 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 6000 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 6000 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes merely by going through a spec sheet. The pic underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL2 and 6000.

Clearly, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-PL2 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-PL2 will show extra detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-PL2 should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 6000 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 6000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus 6000 as a Portrait photography camera
60
has manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
MP count low (12MP)
19
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
no external flash support
low resolution (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 as a Street photography camera
Olympus 6000 as a Street photography camera
73
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
no articulating screen
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus 6000 as a Sports photography camera
45
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames/s)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
bad battery life (280 shots)
no phase detect AF
33
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lack of shutter priority mode
low resolution (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Travel photography advice
Olympus 6000 Travel photography advice
51
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse recording
bad battery life (280 CIPA)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
61
environment proofing
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse function
low resolution (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Landscape photography factors
Olympus 6000 Landscape photography factors
61
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
MP count low (12MP)
bad battery life (280 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse recording
35
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual mode
low resolution (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
missing Timelapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus 6000 as a Vlogging camera
29
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detect focusing
does not have selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have microphone jack
28
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 resolution)
missing microphone jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus 6000 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus 6000
 Olympus PEN E-PL2Olympus Stylus Tough 6000
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus PEN E-PL2 Olympus Stylus Tough 6000
Alternate name - mju Tough 6000
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2011-02-11 2009-07-01
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Truepic V -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 4032 x 3024 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 6400 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 50
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 11 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-102mm (3.6x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-5.1
Macro focus range - 2cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Display resolution 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 1/4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 10.00 m 4.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/160 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 362 gr (0.80 lbs) 179 gr (0.39 lbs)
Dimensions 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 95 x 63 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.2 not tested
DXO Low light score 573 not tested
Other
Battery life 280 photographs -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-5 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $0 $259