Clicky

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS

Portability
85
Imaging
48
Features
47
Overall
47
Olympus PEN E-PL2 front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front
Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-PL2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
  • Launched February 2011
  • Replaced the Olympus E-PL1s
  • Updated by Olympus E-PL3
Olympus TG-850 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
  • 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
  • Introduced January 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview

Lets take a closer look at the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus TG-850 iHS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both built by Olympus. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-PL2 was introduced 4 years prior to the TG-850 iHS which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the E-PL2 scores against the TG-850 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS

 E-PL2 TG-850 iHS 
Manually focus More precise focus

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus E-PL2

 TG-850 iHS E-PL2 
IntroducedJanuary 2014February 2011Newer by 36 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus TG-850 iHS

 E-PL2 TG-850 iHS 
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurement
Screen resolution460k460kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither includes selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL2 features outer measurements of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) and the Olympus TG-850 iHS has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus TG-850 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the E-PL2 and the TG-850 iHS.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL2 and TG-850 iHS is 85 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison

Often, it is hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by going over specifications. The pic underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL2 and TG-850 iHS.

Plainly, each of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL2 using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus TG-850 iHS will deliver more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged E-PL2 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus TG-850 iHS Portrait photography highlights
60
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
35
resolution is good (16MP)
has face detect focus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-PL2
Street photography with Olympus TG-850 iHS
73
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
69
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
weather sealing
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-850 iHS as a Sports photography camera
45
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
low megapixels (12MP)
not so great battery (280 CIPA)
has no phase detect AF
51
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
weather sealing
good battery (330 shots)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Travel photography highlights
Olympus TG-850 iHS Travel photography highlights
51
built-in flash
missing Timelapse mode
not so great battery (280 CIPA)
low megapixels (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
72
good battery (330 shots)
weather sealing
resolution is good (16MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (21mm)
display is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Landscape photography advice
Olympus TG-850 iHS Landscape photography advice
61
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
not so great battery (280 shots)
missing Timelapse mode
50
quite wide (21mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
weather sealing
good battery (330 CIPA)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
very small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL2 Vlogging information
Olympus TG-850 iHS Vlogging information
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detection focusing
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone port
33
quite wide (21mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have mic support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus TG-850 iHS
 Olympus PEN E-PL2Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus PEN E-PL2 Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Launched 2011-02-11 2014-01-29
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Truepic V TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 -
Full resolution 4032 x 3024 4616 x 3464
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Min native ISO 100 125
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 11 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 21-105mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-5.7
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 460k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 1/2 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps 7.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 10.00 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/160 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264, Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Yes
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 362g (0.80 lb) 218g (0.48 lb)
Dimensions 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 55 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.4 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.2 not tested
DXO Low light rating 573 not tested
Other
Battery life 280 shots 330 shots
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-5 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval))
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $0 $250