Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-860
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0db25/0db25b50f5db0e38bf19b46696bb0e06a463d704" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL2 front Olympus PEN E-PL2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL1s
- Updated by Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Successor is Olympus TG-870
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-PL2 versus Olympus TG-860, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both are built by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and TG-860 (16MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and TG-860 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-PL2 was released 5 years prior to the TG-860 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-PL2 grades vs the TG-860 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL2 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery & Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus TG-860
E-PL2 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus E-PL2
TG-860 | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | ![]() | February 2011 | More recent by 48 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus TG-860
E-PL2 | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL2 enjoys outer measurements of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-860 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PL2 versus Olympus TG-860 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-PL2 vs the TG-860.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b88b2/b88b28c087e5dacc4079ae7fe73b515b11ab2cb8" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL2 and TG-860 is 85 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b08a/0b08aea397b8b75b22cb4f5bdc834be92c0b6f19" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements simply by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL2 and TG-860.
Clearly, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL2 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Olympus TG-860 will result in more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The older E-PL2 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a1ad/3a1ad949ac037bbf66a36434e2fa9187ecf785cf" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78790/78790e2ca70d37acfa7cae5fcc631e9fb64239c0" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2011-02-11 | 2015-02-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Truepic V | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 362g (0.80 lb) | 224g (0.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 photos | 300 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $0 | $279 |