Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-870
85 Imaging
48 Features
47 Overall
47
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Released February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL1s
- Updated by Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2016
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-860
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
Below is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus TG-870, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact and they are both built by Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and TG-870 (16MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and TG-870 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-PL2 was manufactured 5 years prior to the TG-870 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-870 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-PL2 matches up against the TG-870 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL2 and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery and Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus TG-870
E-PL2 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Olympus E-PL2
TG-870 | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2016 | February 2011 | More recent by 59 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Sharper display (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus TG-870
E-PL2 | TG-870 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL2 features physical dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-870 has sizing of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus TG-870 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-PL2 vs the TG-870.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL2 and TG-870 is 85 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through specs. The photograph below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL2 and TG-870.
All in all, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-PL2 due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus TG-870 will give you extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos far more aggressively. The older E-PL2 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2011-02-11 | 2016-01-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Truepic V | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 362 gr (0.80 lb) | 221 gr (0.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 photos | 300 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $0 | $280 |