Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-340
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0db25/0db25b50f5db0e38bf19b46696bb0e06a463d704" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL2 front Olympus PEN E-PL2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f15c/0f15c591df6691d1385fd9ef9a58f17d9653b4b3" alt="Olympus VR-340 front Olympus VR-340 front"
96 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL1s
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus VR-340, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both sold by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and VR-340 (16MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and VR-340 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-PL2 was announced 11 months before the VR-340 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-340 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-PL2 scores vs the VR-340 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-340 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL2 and Olympus VR-340. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery and Olympus VR-340 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Olympus VR-340
E-PL2 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Olympus E-PL2
VR-340 | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | ![]() | February 2011 | More recent by 11 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus VR-340
E-PL2 | VR-340 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL2 comes with exterior measurements of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-340 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL2 and Olympus VR-340 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-PL2 against the VR-340.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2ae4/a2ae4630dac5c87e94da15bc051d54cf8fe84f5e" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL2 and VR-340 is 85 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30606/3060652c1ce1250fb3c98823227a058457fc889f" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor measurements purely by researching technical specs. The graphic here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL2 and VR-340.
As you can tell, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PL2 using its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus VR-340 will provide you with greater detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older E-PL2 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27982/279822dd1d49ca8274e30880947b3cff48f9044d" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60f21/60f2160df9ee4e6b800e6bcae27b0e287ac1c2c0" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus VR-340 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Olympus VR-340 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-02-11 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.0-5.7 |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 4.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 362 gr (0.80 lbs) | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $0 | $130 |