Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS200
85 Imaging
48 Features
47 Overall
47
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL1s
- Refreshed by Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Also referred to as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS100
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus E-PL2 versus Panasonic ZS200, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and ZS200 (20MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and ZS200 (1") provide totally different sensor sizing.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-PL2 was launched 8 years prior to the ZS200 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a short overview of how the E-PL2 grades versus the ZS200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL2 & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Panasonic ZS200
| E-PL2 | ZS200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus E-PL2
| ZS200 | E-PL2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2018 |  | February 2011 | More modern by 85 months |
| Screen resolution | 1240k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+780k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Panasonic ZS200
| E-PL2 | ZS200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL2 has got outer dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS200 has specifications of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") along with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL2 versus Panasonic ZS200 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-PL2 and the ZS200.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL2 and ZS200 is 85 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes merely by reading through a spec sheet. The pic below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL2 and ZS200.
Clearly, the two cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-PL2 because of its bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Panasonic ZS200 will resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged E-PL2 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
| Also called | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-02-11 | 2018-02-13 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Truepic V | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/160 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 362g (0.80 lbs) | 340g (0.75 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 573 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 images | 370 images |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $0 | $800 |