Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS80
85 Imaging
48 Features
47 Overall
47
86 Imaging
47 Features
70 Overall
56
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Released February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL1s
- Newer Model is Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 327g - 112 x 69 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Alternate Name is Lumix DC-TZ95
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS70
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS80 Overview
In this write-up, we are looking at the Olympus E-PL2 and Panasonic ZS80, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and ZS80 (20MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and ZS80 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-PL2 was manufactured 8 years prior to the ZS80 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS80 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-PL2 scores against the ZS80 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS80 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL2 & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery & Panasonic ZS80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Panasonic ZS80
E-PL2 | ZS80 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS80 over the Olympus E-PL2
ZS80 | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | February 2011 | Newer by 85 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Panasonic ZS80
E-PL2 | ZS80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS80 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL2 enjoys outer measurements of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS80 has specifications of 112mm x 69mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.7") having a weight of 327 grams (0.72 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL2 and Panasonic ZS80 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-PL2 versus the ZS80.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL2 and ZS80 is 85 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS80 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions just by checking a spec sheet. The pic underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL2 and ZS80.
Clearly, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-PL2 featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh easier and the Panasonic ZS80 will give extra detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged E-PL2 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS80 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS80 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS80 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DC-TZ95 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2011-02-11 | 2018-02-18 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Truepic V | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 5.60 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 362 grams (0.80 lbs) | 327 grams (0.72 lbs) |
Dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 112 x 69 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 pictures | 380 pictures |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $0 | $448 |