Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic 3D1
85 Imaging
48 Features
47 Overall
47
93 Imaging
36 Features
36 Overall
36
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic 3D1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Released February 2011
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL1s
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 193g - 108 x 58 x 24mm
- Introduced November 2011
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic 3D1 Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic 3D1, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-PL2 (12MP) and the 3D1 (12MP) is very well matched but the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and 3D1 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-PL2 was unveiled 8 months earlier than the 3D1 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic 3D1 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-PL2 scores versus the 3D1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic 3D1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery & Panasonic 3D1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Panasonic 3D1
E-PL2 | 3D1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic 3D1 over the Olympus E-PL2
3D1 | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2011 | February 2011 | Newer by 8 months | |
Display sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Panasonic 3D1
E-PL2 | 3D1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic 3D1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL2 comes with external dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) whilst the Panasonic 3D1 has sizing of 108mm x 58mm x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic 3D1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-PL2 compared to the 3D1.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL2 and 3D1 is 85 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic 3D1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions just by looking at a spec sheet. The pic below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL2 and 3D1.
Clearly, both the cameras enjoy the same exact resolution but different sensor dimensions. The E-PL2 offers the larger sensor which will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult. The more aged E-PL2 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic 3D1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic 3D1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2011-02-11 | 2011-11-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Truepic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3.5" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Full Touch Screen with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/160 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 362g (0.80 lbs) | 193g (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 108 x 58 x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 images | 200 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $0 | $670 |