Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FZ2500
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0db25/0db25b50f5db0e38bf19b46696bb0e06a463d704" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL2 front Olympus PEN E-PL2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdd51/cdd51cf2d542515b3ba6c6c81eb98dc3a189d634" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 front"
53 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched February 2011
- Replaced the Olympus E-PL1s
- Later Model is Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Launched September 2016
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Succeeded the Panasonic FZ1000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FZ2500, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and FZ2500 (1") offer totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-PL2 was released 6 years earlier than the FZ2500 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-PL2 scores against the FZ2500 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery & Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Panasonic FZ2500
E-PL2 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus E-PL2
FZ2500 | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2016 | ![]() | February 2011 | More recent by 68 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Panasonic FZ2500
E-PL2 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL2 has exterior measurements of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ2500 has dimensions of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") accompanied by a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FZ2500 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-PL2 against the FZ2500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2bc26/2bc265f916e16ff90ceaa48d1fa9e2dbcc50bef5" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FZ2500 size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FZ2500 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL2 and FZ2500 is 85 and 53 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d98a/4d98a060ae296891fb8b478184d0809508b820c1" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FZ2500 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FZ2500 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading through specifications. The visual underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL2 and FZ2500.
Plainly, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL2 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Panasonic FZ2500 will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older E-PL2 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67560/6756093b82dc1772f0691813ed9da666bb094857" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FZ2500 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FZ2500 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6e32/e6e321e7573b001a71b4a66cc623de7caf9ce7dd" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2011-02-11 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Truepic V | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 362g (0.80 lb) | 915g (2.02 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 55 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.2 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | 573 | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 pictures | 350 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-5 | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $0 | $998 |