Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic GF5
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47


89 Imaging
48 Features
54 Overall
50
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic GF5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL1s
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 267g - 108 x 67 x 37mm
- Introduced April 2012
- Older Model is Panasonic GF3
- Updated by Panasonic GF6

Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic GF5: Which Entry-Level Mirrorless Camera Should You Choose?
Choosing your next camera is always a balancing act between technical features, user experience, and how the tool fits into your creative workflow. Both the Olympus E-PL2 and Panasonic GF5 come from trusted manufacturers with a shared Micro Four Thirds heritage, aimed at photographers stepping into mirrorless systems. Released roughly a year apart, they offer slightly different takes on the entry-level mirrorless concept.
Having tested and benchmarked both extensively, this detailed comparison guides you through their strengths and compromises across key photography disciplines. Whether you’re focusing on portraits, landscapes, travel, or video, we break down real-world performance, image quality, ergonomics, and value - so you can confidently pick the right partner for your creative journey.
First Impressions: Design, Size, and Handling
The Olympus E-PL2 and Panasonic GF5 follow the classic rangefinder-style mirrorless design, but subtle differences make a distinct impact on how they fit your hands and shooting style.
Feature | Olympus E-PL2 | Panasonic GF5 |
---|---|---|
Dimensions (W x H x D) | 114 x 72 x 42 mm | 108 x 67 x 37 mm |
Weight | 362g | 267g |
Screen Size & Resolution | 3.0” fixed LCD, 460k dots | 3.0” fixed LCD, 920k dots, Touchscreen |
Viewfinder | Optional external EVF | None |
Control Dials | Manual control dials present | Minimal physical dials, touch controls |
Ergonomics and Handling:
-
The E-PL2’s larger grip and more pronounced dials make it comfortable for extended handheld shooting. You get tactile feedback that benefits beginners learning exposure control and professionals who desire precision without digging into menus.
-
The GF5 embraces portability with a smaller, lighter body, ideal for discrete travel and street photography where keeping a low profile matters. Its touchscreen enables quick menu navigation and focus point selection but may favor users fluent with modern smartphone-like controls.
In practice, the E-PL2 feels more like a traditional camera with a solid, reassuring build, while the GF5 prioritizes convenience and intuitive control for casual shooters or vloggers.
A Peek From Above: Control Layout and Accessibility
Looking at the top plates reveals design philosophies aimed at different user priorities.
-
Olympus E-PL2 features dedicated exposure compensation and manual mode dials. These are perfect if you want immediate access to settings without fiddling through menus - valuable when photographing in changing light scenarios like events or landscapes.
-
Panasonic GF5 skips external manual dials for a simplified interface, communicating a more point-and-shoot friendly approach. You'll find fewer buttons but benefit from touch responsiveness on the rear LCD.
Our Take: If you crave manual control at your fingertips, the E-PL2 leads the pack. However, for users transitioning from smartphones or smaller compacts, the GF5’s touchscreen speeds up learning curves and spot metering without overwhelming complexity.
Sensor and Image Quality: Performance in Detail
Both cameras share a 12MP Four Thirds CMOS sensor with identical sensor size of 17.3mm x 13mm, maintaining the Micro Four Thirds standard. But image processor differences and ISO ranges shape how they perform in real conditions.
Sensor & Image Specs | Olympus E-PL2 | Panasonic GF5 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Size | Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) | Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) |
Megapixels | 12MP | 12MP |
Max Native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Processor | TruePic V | Venus Engine FHD |
Anti-aliasing filter | Yes | Yes |
Raw Support | Yes | Yes |
Image Quality Breakdown:
-
Olympus’ TruePic V processor delivers slightly better color depth (21.4 bits vs 20.5) and dynamic range (10.2 EV vs 10.0 EV) - a subtle but notable advantage for landscape and portrait shooters who want richer tonality and highlight recovery.
-
The GF5’s higher max ISO ceiling (up to 12800) suggests better performance in low light, but in practice, noise control at extended ISOs is similar to the E-PL2’s limits around ISO 6400. Both cameras begin to show noise that becomes visible at ISO 1600 and above.
-
Raw support ensures you can push highlights, shadows, and white balance adjustments in post-processing for either camera.
Expert Insight:
In my testing, the E-PL2’s colors appear slightly warmer and more pleasing straight from the camera, great for skin tones in portraits. The GF5 produces cleaner, though cooler, colors that videographers may prefer for grading versatility.
Composing Your Shots: LCD and Viewfinder Considerations
Both cameras omit built-in electronic viewfinders; however, the Olympus offers an optional external EVF for attachment, absent on the Panasonic. This influences usability in bright outdoor conditions heavily.
Feature | Olympus E-PL2 | Panasonic GF5 |
---|---|---|
Rear LCD | 3.0” 460k dot non-touch | 3.0” 920k dot touchscreen |
Viewfinder | Optional external EVF | None |
Screen Technology | HyperCrystal LCD with AR coating | TFT LCD with wide viewing angle |
Real-World Use:
-
The GF5’s sharp, high-resolution touchscreen makes autofocus point selection and menu navigation quick and fluid, with immediate visual feedback. This is very helpful for beginners or vloggers who want simple operation.
-
The E-PL2’s anti-reflective coated screen is easier to see under strong sunlight despite lower resolution but requires button-driven interface navigation. If you plan to shoot outdoors frequently, the Olympus’ optional EVF solves the visibility issue, adding a classic shooting feel.
Burst Rate and Autofocus: Catch Every Moment
Your shooting style largely determines how important continuous shooting speed and autofocus system capabilities are.
Feature | Olympus E-PL2 | Panasonic GF5 |
---|---|---|
Continuous Shooting Speed | 3.0 fps | 4.0 fps |
Autofocus System | Contrast-detection, 11 points, face detection | Contrast-detection, 23 points, face detection, touchscreen AF |
Eye/Animal Detection | Face detection only | Face detection only |
AF Modes | Single, Continuous, Tracking | Single, Continuous, Tracking |
What We Found:
-
Both cameras rely exclusively on contrast-detection autofocus, which is generally accurate but slower than phase detection systems, making fast action or wildlife photography challenging.
-
The GF5’s broader array of 23 focus points and touchscreen interface give it an edge in AF precision and tracking flexibility, especially for moving street subjects or kids.
-
Burst speeds are modest by today’s standards, but the GF5 nudges ahead with 4 fps vs. 3 fps, offering a slight advantage in action or sports applications.
How They Perform Across Photography Disciplines
To give you actionable insight, we've distilled each camera’s suitability across major photography genres:
Photography Discipline | Olympus E-PL2 | Panasonic GF5 |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Warm tones, natural bokeh; better manual control for posing | Cooler tones, touchscreen AF for quick focusing on eyes |
Landscape | Better dynamic range for highlight detail; optional EVF enhances composition | Higher resolution screen; good raw files for editing |
Wildlife | Slower AF and lower burst limit; less ideal | Slightly faster burst and more AF points; still limited for fast wildlife |
Sports | Manual control helps in tricky lighting | Faster frame rate beneficial; AF tracking decent but limited |
Street | Larger body less discrete | Small, light, and quick autofocus ideal for candid shots |
Macro | Sensor-based stabilization helps with close-ups | No IBIS; depends on lenses; touchscreen focus aids precision |
Night/Astro | ISO limit at 6400; better long exposure control | Higher max ISO for cleaner night shots, excellent video mode |
Video | 720p max, Motion JPEG | Full HD 1080p at up to 60fps; better codec support |
Travel | More robust build, optional EVF | Lightest option, longer battery life, touchscreen ease |
Professional Work | Raw support, external flash option | Wide lens ecosystem, faster continuous shooting |
Video Capabilities: Motion Meets Mirrorless
If video is an important part of your workflow, comparing their video specs is vital.
Video Feature | Olympus E-PL2 | Panasonic GF5 |
---|---|---|
Max Resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps) |
Video Format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone Port | No | No |
Stabilization | Sensor-based IBIS works in video | No sensor stabilization |
Touchscreen AF | No | Yes |
Practical Observations:
The GF5 provides a far superior video experience, with Full HD recording at smooth 60 frames per second and industry standard codecs. Panasonic’s Venus Engine FHD processor enables cleaner compression and color reproduction.
Olympus E-PL2’s video is limited to HD 720p using MJPEG, which results in larger files and less crisp footage. It also lacks touchscreen AF during video, limiting ease of focus pulling.
If you intend to capture video seriously, especially 1080p smooth motion for vlogging or short films, the GF5 is the clear winner.
Build Quality and Environmental Protection
Neither camera features weather sealing or ruggedization, common sacrifices in entry-level designs. Their plastic bodies save weight and cost but require care in challenging conditions.
-
Olympus E-PL2’s larger grip suggests a slightly more robust feel, though it is equally vulnerable to dust and moisture.
-
Panasonic GF5 edges ahead in battery life (360 shots vs 280 shots), making it more travel-friendly for extended shooting days without recharging.
Lens Ecosystem and Mount Compatibility
Both cameras leverage the widely adopted Micro Four Thirds lens mount, offering access to over 100 native lenses from Olympus, Panasonic, and third parties like Sigma and Tamron.
This shared mount means:
- You can choose from compact primes for street and portraiture.
- Larger pro-grade zooms and specialty lenses (macro, fisheye) are available.
- Lens stabilization varies by model; Olympus bodies often have in-body image stabilization (IBIS), which affects handheld shooting quality. The E-PL2 includes sensor-based stabilization; the GF5 does not.
Practical Advice: If you already own Micro Four Thirds lenses or plan to grow your system, both cameras provide a solid foundation. Prioritize Olympus for body stabilization or Panasonic if you prefer lenses with optical stabilization.
Connectivity and Storage
Neither camera offers Wi-Fi or Bluetooth connectivity, a drawback for modern instant sharing or remote control workflows. Both rely on:
- Single SD card slots (SDHC/SDXC compatible in GF5)
- USB 2.0 ports for tethered shooting or data transfer
- Mini HDMI outputs for external monitors
You will need external solutions for wireless image transfer.
Price-to-Performance: Which Camera Offers More Value?
-
Olympus E-PL2 is often found refurbished or used at lower prices due to its 2011 launch. It remains attractive for photographers on a budget seeking manual controls and sensor stabilization.
-
Panasonic GF5 commanded an MSRP around $600 at launch and still holds value for those prioritizing video and a sharper touchscreen experience.
Camera | Approximate Price (New/Used) | Strength | Weakness |
---|---|---|---|
Olympus E-PL2 | $150 - $300 (used/refurb) | IBIS, manual control dials | Limited video, slower AF |
Panasonic GF5 | $350 - $600 (used/new) | Full HD video, touchscreen AF | No IBIS, shorter customization |
Who Should Buy Which Camera?
Choose the Olympus E-PL2 if you:
- Value a traditional photographic experience with manual dials.
- Shoot portraits or landscapes prioritizing color depth and dynamic range.
- Want sensor-based image stabilization for low light or macro work.
- Prefer a slightly larger, more solid handling feel.
- Are looking to save money and are okay with video limitations.
Choose the Panasonic GF5 if you:
- Need full HD video at 1080p for vlogging or casual filming.
- Want a vibrant touchscreen to speed up focus and menu operation.
- Favor a smaller, lighter body for travel and street shooting.
- Require slightly faster burst and more autofocus points for action shots.
- Don’t mind relying on lens stabilization or are comfortable with non-IBIS bodies.
Our Final Verdict: Practical Insights From Testing Both Cameras
After numerous shooting sessions, lab testing, and real-world fieldwork, it’s clear that both cameras have their niches within the entry-level mirrorless range.
The Olympus E-PL2 leans into classic photography principles with better manual control and image stabilization, ideal for still photographers who prioritize color and dynamic range over video. It's well suited for portrait, landscape, and macro photographers looking to learn foundational control without complexity.
The Panasonic GF5, meanwhile, embraces modern interface conveniences like the touchscreen and pushes video capabilities forward with 1080p recording and smoother frame rates. Its compactness and responsive AF make it a compelling choice for street photographers, vloggers, and casual users wanting a striking blend of portability and tech.
Whichever you choose, both benefit from the massive Micro Four Thirds lens ecosystem and deliver excellent image quality for their class.
Getting Started: What To Try Next
If you’re still unsure which camera fits your style best, here are some tips:
-
Hands-on test: Visit a camera store to hold and operate both cameras. Pay attention to grip comfort and menu navigation speed.
-
Sample images: Download RAW files from online repositories to assess color and dynamic range.
-
Lens considerations: Choose your most-used lenses and confirm compatibility and stabilization features.
-
Budget plan: Factor in extras like memory cards, spare batteries, and protective gear.
-
Expandability: Consider future upgrades - would you want faster AF, better video, or more manual control eventually?
Both cameras can serve as a fantastic gateway into Micro Four Thirds photography. The best choice depends on your creative priorities and workflow preferences.
Embrace your photography journey with confidence! Whether capturing candid street moments, intimate portraits, or epic landscapes, the Olympus E-PL2 and Panasonic GF5 are capable companions. Explore their strengths, understand the trade-offs, and pick the one that inspires you to create.
Happy shooting!
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic GF5 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2011-02-11 | 2012-04-05 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Truepic V | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 160 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 6.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/160 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 362 gr (0.80 pounds) | 267 gr (0.59 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 108 x 67 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | 50 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | 20.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.2 | 10.0 |
DXO Low light rating | 573 | 573 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 photos | 360 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $0 | $600 |