Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS100
85 Imaging
48 Features
47 Overall
47
87 Imaging
52 Features
65 Overall
57
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL1s
- Newer Model is Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-250mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 312g - 111 x 65 x 44mm
- Launched January 2016
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-TZ100
- Updated by Panasonic ZS200
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS100 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS100, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and ZS100 (20MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and ZS100 (1") use different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe E-PL2 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the ZS100 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS100 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a short view of how the E-PL2 scores versus the ZS100 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS100 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL2 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery and Panasonic ZS100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Panasonic ZS100
E-PL2 | ZS100 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS100 over the Olympus E-PL2
ZS100 | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2016 | February 2011 | Fresher by 59 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Crisper display (+580k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Panasonic ZS100
E-PL2 | ZS100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS100 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL2 has external dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS100 has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 44mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") and a weight of 312 grams (0.69 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS100 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL2 vs the ZS100.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-PL2 and ZS100 is 85 and 87 respectively.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS100 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing just by going over a spec sheet. The photograph here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL2 and ZS100.
Clearly, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-PL2 using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic ZS100 will offer you more detail having an extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older E-PL2 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic ZS100 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ100 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-02-11 | 2016-01-05 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Truepic V | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 9.9 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | 8.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 4K/UHD (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 @ 60p/60i/30p/24p, 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 362g (0.80 pounds) | 312g (0.69 pounds) |
Dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 111 x 65 x 44mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 55 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.2 | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 573 | 559 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 shots | 300 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $0 | $700 |