Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax K110D
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0db25/0db25b50f5db0e38bf19b46696bb0e06a463d704" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL2 front Olympus PEN E-PL2 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b26ee/b26ee354c3adaf0307bfc7498c215c4050aaeba0" alt="Pentax K110D front Pentax K110D front"
67 Imaging
44 Features
30 Overall
38
Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax K110D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL1s
- New Model is Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 585g - 129 x 93 x 70mm
- Announced May 2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax K110D Overview
Below is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus E-PL2 and Pentax K110D, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the E-PL2 (12MP) and K110D (6MP) and the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and K110D (APS-C) possess different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-PL2 was revealed 4 years later than the K110D and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K110D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-PL2 scores vs the K110D for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax K110D Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus PEN E-PL2 & Pentax K110D. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery & Pentax K110D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Pentax K110D
E-PL2 | K110D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2011 | ![]() | May 2006 | More recent by 58 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 210k | Crisper screen (+250k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K110D over the Olympus E-PL2
K110D | E-PL2 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Pentax K110D
E-PL2 | K110D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax K110D Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-PL2 enjoys exterior measurements of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) while the Pentax K110D has dimensions of 129mm x 93mm x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") having a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-PL2 and Pentax K110D in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-PL2 against the K110D.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d4f1/4d4f1dece0c207288abc9e0cdf4faebd7a1e80b0" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax K110D size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax K110D size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL2 and K110D is 85 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3087b/3087be96a0864058869ab202f26e9092c6b66d68" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax K110D top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax K110D top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax K110D Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading through specifications. The photograph here will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL2 and K110D.
Plainly, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-PL2 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus E-PL2 will resolve extra detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-PL2 provides a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a8de/5a8de77bd3278a800024a1c44c9f8dd57ae72ca1" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax K110D sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax K110D sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax K110D Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/69d64/69d6459f8b7f71f5acf15b3b65d1db17ae72254b" alt="Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax K110D Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax K110D Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-PL2 vs Pentax K110D Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Pentax K110D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Pentax K110D |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2011-02-11 | 2006-05-22 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Truepic V | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 6MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3008 x 2008 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF |
Total lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 210k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/160 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 362 grams (0.80 lbs) | 585 grams (1.29 lbs) |
Dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 129 x 93 x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/MMC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $0 | $1,000 |