Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
85 Imaging
48 Features
47 Overall
47
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Announced February 2011
- Older Model is Olympus E-PL1s
- Replacement is Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Revealed September 2010
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus E-PL2 versus Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-PL2 (12MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) is fairly well matched but the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) feature different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-PL2 was launched 5 months later than the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-PL2 grades vs the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus PEN E-PL2 & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
E-PL2 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Olympus E-PL2
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | E-PL2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
E-PL2 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2011 | September 2010 | Similar age | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-PL2 enjoys physical dimensions of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has specifications of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") having a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
See the Olympus E-PL2 versus Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-PL2 and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-PL2 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 85 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements simply by reading through specs. The graphic below will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL2 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
As you can plainly see, both cameras enjoy the same exact megapixel count but different sensor measurements. The E-PL2 has got the tinier sensor which is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL2 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2011-02-11 | 2010-09-21 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Truepic V | GR Engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/160s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 362 grams (0.80 lbs) | 140 grams (0.31 lbs) |
Dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 55 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 573 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 photographs | 320 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-5 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $0 | $566 |